Are some creating 'incurable' diseases to promote death, disease and business in the world ?

Diseases like IBS, Crohns, and others appear to be caused by a bacteria or parasite, problem is there are no good tests to detect them.





So why not treat for a suspected infection, rather than create a 'disease' then raise millions to find a cure for the problems, when the cause is rather obvious to some ?





Is the millions to be made in research funding the real problem ?Are some creating 'incurable' diseases to promote death, disease and business in the world ?
There are many problems with the way we in America deal with disease and especially the degenerative diseases. The drug companies are in the business of selling drugs, not nutrition, not preventing diseases, but treating the symptoms.





We have, in America, the most fertile ground for drug companies to prosper in the world. Our farming and animal husbandry combined with food manufacturers have the profit motive before health as their mantra.





The Jerry Lewis non profit organization has been collecting money to fight MS for many decades. In fact, it has collected over 1 billion dollars to fund this research. Has the disease been cured? No. One billion dollars trying to find a drug to cure this disease. Heart disease kills 75% of all Americans. We know that most heart disease is caused from a nano bacteria and 80% of diabetes type II is caused by a nano bacteria.





We also know that the life expectancy in America now ranks 24th in the world. That means that 23 countries in the world have people that live longer than Americans, yet we are told we are the healthiest nation in the world and send doctors to foreign countries to help the afflicted. They should be sending people here to help us!





I do not believe drug companies are evil or have bad motives, but it is obvious that profit is the motivation and health is not an objective. Treating symptoms is their directive and makes the most economical sense. Why would a drug company choose to cure a disease and eliminate the problem over masking the symptoms and generating a huge need for using the drug for the life of the patient.





A very good example of this is the antacid issue. Antacids represent 40 billion dollar per year revenue for drug companies. This is the biggest farce ever dreamed up by drug companies, and furthermore they know it. It is not stomach acid that causes heartburn, it is Lactic acid from rotting, fermenting, undigested food due to the lack of stomach acid, not the over abundance. 40% of people over 50 have some form of hypochloridia (lack of stomach acid). When given the antacids, this keeps the food from being digested because it neutralizes the stomach acid and lactic acid. The symptoms are treated, but only temporarily and so many other problems are created that require you to buy anti diarrhea drugs, diseases caused by the rotting, fermenting, food that is not being digested and ends up as stored fat around the belly.





Now ask yourself why the drug companies don't recommend the real cure of taking Betaine HCL, an activator, and a digestive enzyme after each meal. Answer: The antacids are very expensive and the real solution is cheap and does not create the other side effects and diseases that will need to be treated later.





Just imagine the billions of dollars earned by just this one issue that could be used to perfect organic farming that will produce healthy food instead of the garbage found in grocery stores now. Additionally, imagine all the health care companies that would be seeking out clients instead of people scrambling for help to curb the enormous costs of a drug culture.





Money doesn't talk, it screams!





good luck to youAre some creating 'incurable' diseases to promote death, disease and business in the world ?
There is a lot doctors don't know about, but they're learning more every day. These diseases also may be caused by our bodies fighting with some of their makeup. I think we've always had these problems, but now they're learning more about how to better control or cure them.





You couldn't treat for a ';suspected infection';, because each medication acts differently- have to have an effect on this tissue, but not damage the one next to it.





I believe the culprit here is the pharmaceutical companies - they spend a great deal of money for multiple-page ads to promote a new medication, and people getting that money want to stay in their good graces, so they discourage the articles that have to do with simple solutions. There's a conflict of interest there.





Some medications that cost a ridiculous amount of money may not be near as effective as the older medications, but this is not advertised, so the drug companies are getting rich enough to advertise prescription medicines to the general public with 30 minute commercials, that we couldn't buy if we wanted to.